THE EFFECT OF BLENDED LEARNING MODEL AND LEARNING MOTIVATION ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES AT SMK BINA PANGUDI LUHUR JAKARTA
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the Blended Learning Model and Learning Motivation on Student Learning Outcomes at SMK Bina Pangudi Luhur Jakarta.. The research method used is a quantitative method. The research population was all students in class XI OTKP at SMK Bina Pangudi Luhur. The sample used in this study was 100 students with multiple linear regression techniques. Variable data X1 (Blended Learning) and X2 (Learning Motivation) are primary data using a Likert scale. While the data variable Y (Learning Outcomes) is secondary data by using test questions, namely pre-test and post-test. The data analysis technique used SPSS 25.0 with the results of the F test in the ANOVA table being Fcount (3,435)>Ftable (3.09). The T test in the analysis of this study is Tcount X1 (-1.982)>Ttable (-1.666) it can be concluded that there is a negative influence between the Blended Learning Learning Model on Learning Outcomes. Then for Tcount X2 (-1,624)<Ttable (-1.666) it can be concluded that there is a negative influence between Learning Motivation on Learning Outcomes. Based on the results of data analysis that this study has a multiple regression equation Y = 83,788
– 0.289 X1 – 0.323 X2. The coefficient of determination test (R2) is 0,66, which means that Blended Learning (X1) and Learning Motivation (X2) have an effect on Learning Outcomes (Y) of 66%.
References
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2006). A study on students’ views on blended learning environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.25211
Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424
Anthony R. Artino, J. (2005). Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Internet and Higher Education, 40(9), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Emda, A. (2018). Kedudukan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v5i2.2838
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., & Maussen, S. (2017). The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Accounting Education, 26(1), 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911
Fahlevi, F. (2020, March 3). FSGI: PJJ Masih Banyak Kendala, Siswa Tak Punya Gawai dan Kuota Hingga Rasa Bosan Artikel ini telah tayang di Tribunnews.com dengan judul FSGI: PJJ Masih Banyak Kendala, Siswa Tak Punya Gawai dan Kuota Hingga Rasa Bosan, https://www.tribunnews.com/nasiona. 30 Desember. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2020/12/30/fsgi-pjj-masih-banyak-kendala-siswa-tak-punya-gawai-dan-kuota-hingga-rasa-bosan?page=1
Hidayat, A. (2012). Hipotesis Penelitian Adalah: Penjelasan Lengkap. 14 Oktober 2012. https://www.statistikian.com/2012/10/hipotesis.html
Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). SC. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002
Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
Meilani, R. I. (2017). Impak minat dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa ( The impacts of students ’ learning interest and motivation on their learning outcomes ). 2(2), 188–201.
Nurhasanah, S., & Sobandi, A. (2016). Minat belajar sebagai determinan hasil belajar siswa. 1(1), 128–135.
Prodjo, W. A. (2020, March 2). 50 Siswa Sampaikan Masalah PJJ ke Mendikbud Nadiem, Dari Tugas Berat sampai Dana BOS Belum Efektif. 18 Juni. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2020/06/18/182021771/50-siswa-sampaikan-masalah-pjj-ke-mendikbud-nadiem-dari-tugas-berat-sampai?page=all
Putra, Y. M. P. (2020). Kemendikbud: Guru Masih Alami Kendala Hadapi PJJ. 22 Oktober. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/qilo66284/kemendikbud-guru-masih-alami-kendala-hadapi-pjj
Sandi, F. (2020). Menteri Nadiem Ungkap Kendala Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh. 07 Agustus. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200807192842-4-178345/menteri-nadiem-ungkap-kendala-pembelajaran-jarak-jauh
Umam, C. (2021, March 3). Evaluasi PJJ, Kemendikbud Sebut Ada Penurunan Hasil Belajar Siswa Artikel ini telah tayang di Tribunnews.com dengan judul Evaluasi PJJ, Kemendikbud Sebut Ada Penurunan Hasil Belajar Siswa, https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2021/01/23/evaluasi-pjj-kemend. 23 Januari. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2021/01/23/evaluasi-pjj-kemendikbud-sebut-ada-penurunan-hasil-belajar-siswa
Usman, U. (2019). Komunikasi Pendidikan Berbasis Blended Learning Dalam Membentuk Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Jurnalisa, 4(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurnalisa.v4i1.5626
Yu, Z., Gao, M., & Wang, L. (2020). The Effect of Educational Games on Learning Outcomes, Student Motivation, Engagement and Satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 Rismawati Nurul Fadilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
